Jurmala vs Phuket: cost of living for digital nomads
Jurmala, Latvia and Phuket, Thailand, line by line from the catalogue: what a month costs, rent, food, coworking, safety and internet. Every figure links back to its source on the city page.
The short version
- Jurmala is about 3% cheaper than Phuket for a month of nomad living ($1,405 vs $1,450).
- Jurmala scores higher on safety (8/10 vs 7/10).
- Internet is faster in Jurmala: 190 Mbps typical against 180 Mbps.
- Jurmala is continental; Phuket is tropical.
Jurmala wins 6 of the measured lines; Phuket wins 1.
Frequently asked questions
Which city is cheaper, Jurmala or Phuket?
Jurmala is cheaper: about $1,405/month against $1,450/month in Phuket, roughly 3% less for a typical remote worker's budget.
Which city is safer, Jurmala or Phuket?
Jurmala scores higher on safety: 8/10 against 7/10 for Phuket.
Which has faster internet, Jurmala or Phuket?
Jurmala has faster typical internet: 190 Mbps against 180 Mbps in Phuket.
| Line | Jurmala | Phuket |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly total (USD) | $1,405 | $1,450 |
| Rent | $600 | $600 |
| Food | $370 | $380 |
| Transport | $35 | $70 |
| Coworking | $100 | $120 |
| Safety (out of 10) | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Internet (Mbps) | 190 | 180 |
| Climate | continental | tropical |
| City size | small | mid |
| Setting | coast | island |
| Nomad score (out of 10) | 6/10 | 8/10 |
Costs are typical monthly figures for one person in USD, from the sources named on each city page; safety and internet are the catalogue's own ratings. Cost figures verified (Eastern Time): Jurmala September 11, 2026, Phuket September 10, 2026.