Ho Chi Minh City vs Swakopmund: cost of living for digital nomads

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam and Swakopmund, Namibia, line by line from the catalogue: what a month costs, rent, food, coworking, safety and internet. Every figure links back to its source on the city page.

The short version

  • Swakopmund is about 2% cheaper than Ho Chi Minh City for a month of nomad living ($1,125 vs $1,150).
  • Rent is the biggest gap: $450 in Swakopmund against $500 in Ho Chi Minh City.
  • Both score 8/10 on safety.
  • Internet is faster in Ho Chi Minh City: 90 Mbps typical against 80 Mbps.
  • Ho Chi Minh City is tropical; Swakopmund is arid.

Ho Chi Minh City wins 2 of the measured lines; Swakopmund wins 4.

Frequently asked questions

Which city is cheaper, Ho Chi Minh City or Swakopmund?

Swakopmund is cheaper: about $1,125/month against $1,150/month in Ho Chi Minh City, roughly 2% less for a typical remote worker's budget.

Which city is safer, Ho Chi Minh City or Swakopmund?

Ho Chi Minh City and Swakopmund score the same on safety, 8/10 each.

Which has faster internet, Ho Chi Minh City or Swakopmund?

Ho Chi Minh City has faster typical internet: 90 Mbps against 80 Mbps in Swakopmund.

LineHo Chi Minh CitySwakopmund
Monthly total (USD)$1,150$1,125
Rent$500$450
Food$320$320
Transport$40$30
Coworking$110$75
Safety (out of 10)8/108/10
Internet (Mbps)9080
Climatetropicalarid
City sizemetrosmall
Settinginlandcoast
Nomad score (out of 10)9/106/10

Ho Chi Minh City

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Compare Ho Chi Minh City with

Compare Swakopmund with

Costs are typical monthly figures for one person in USD, from the sources named on each city page; safety and internet are the catalogue's own ratings. Cost figures verified (Eastern Time): Ho Chi Minh City November 6, 2026, Swakopmund September 11, 2026.