Cusco vs Walvis Bay: cost of living for digital nomads

Cusco, Peru and Walvis Bay, Namibia, line by line from the catalogue: what a month costs, rent, food, coworking, safety and internet. Every figure links back to its source on the city page.

The short version

  • Walvis Bay is about 1% cheaper than Cusco for a month of nomad living ($1,070 vs $1,085).
  • Walvis Bay scores higher on safety (8/10 vs 6/10).
  • Internet is faster in Cusco: 80 Mbps typical against 75 Mbps.
  • Cusco is temperate; Walvis Bay is arid.

Cusco wins 3 of the measured lines; Walvis Bay wins 4.

Frequently asked questions

Which city is cheaper, Cusco or Walvis Bay?

Walvis Bay is cheaper: about $1,070/month against $1,085/month in Cusco, roughly 1% less for a typical remote worker's budget.

Which city is safer, Cusco or Walvis Bay?

Walvis Bay scores higher on safety: 8/10 against 6/10 for Cusco.

Which has faster internet, Cusco or Walvis Bay?

Cusco has faster typical internet: 80 Mbps against 75 Mbps in Walvis Bay.

LineCuscoWalvis Bay
Monthly total (USD)$1,085$1,070
Rent$420$420
Food$300$310
Transport$35$30
Coworking$85$70
Safety (out of 10)6/108/10
Internet (Mbps)8075
Climatetemperatearid
City sizemidsmall
Settingmountaincoast
Nomad score (out of 10)7/105/10

Compare Cusco with

Compare Walvis Bay with

Costs are typical monthly figures for one person in USD, from the sources named on each city page; safety and internet are the catalogue's own ratings. Cost figures verified (Eastern Time): Cusco September 11, 2026, Walvis Bay September 11, 2026.