Colombo vs Santa Cruz de la Sierra: cost of living for digital nomads

Colombo, Sri Lanka and Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia, line by line from the catalogue: what a month costs, rent, food, coworking, safety and internet. Every figure links back to its source on the city page.

The short version

  • Santa Cruz de la Sierra is about 1% cheaper than Colombo for a month of nomad living ($1,035 vs $1,050).
  • Rent is the biggest gap: $400 in Santa Cruz de la Sierra against $450 in Colombo.
  • Colombo scores higher on safety (7/10 vs 6/10).
  • Internet is faster in Santa Cruz de la Sierra: 80 Mbps typical against 40 Mbps.
  • Both have a tropical climate.

Colombo wins 2 of the measured lines; Santa Cruz de la Sierra wins 6.

Frequently asked questions

Which city is cheaper, Colombo or Santa Cruz de la Sierra?

Santa Cruz de la Sierra is cheaper: about $1,035/month against $1,050/month in Colombo, roughly 1% less for a typical remote worker's budget.

Which city is safer, Colombo or Santa Cruz de la Sierra?

Colombo scores higher on safety: 7/10 against 6/10 for Santa Cruz de la Sierra.

Which has faster internet, Colombo or Santa Cruz de la Sierra?

Santa Cruz de la Sierra has faster typical internet: 80 Mbps against 40 Mbps in Colombo.

LineColomboSanta Cruz de la Sierra
Monthly total (USD)$1,050$1,035
Rent$450$400
Food$300$290
Transport$40$35
Coworking$90$80
Safety (out of 10)7/106/10
Internet (Mbps)4080
Climatetropicaltropical
City sizemetrometro
Settingcoastinland
Nomad score (out of 10)7/106/10

Santa Cruz de la Sierra

Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia.

Compare Colombo with

Compare Santa Cruz de la Sierra with

Costs are typical monthly figures for one person in USD, from the sources named on each city page; safety and internet are the catalogue's own ratings. Cost figures verified (Eastern Time): Colombo November 6, 2026, Santa Cruz de la Sierra September 11, 2026.