Cochabamba vs Pokhara: cost of living for digital nomads

Cochabamba, Bolivia and Pokhara, Nepal, line by line from the catalogue: what a month costs, rent, food, coworking, safety and internet. Every figure links back to its source on the city page.

The short version

  • Pokhara is about 14% cheaper than Cochabamba for a month of nomad living ($765 vs $890).
  • Rent is the biggest gap: $280 in Pokhara against $330 in Cochabamba.
  • Pokhara scores higher on safety (7/10 vs 6/10).
  • Internet is faster in Cochabamba: 70 Mbps typical against 60 Mbps.
  • Both have a temperate climate.

Cochabamba wins 1 of the measured lines; Pokhara wins 7.

Frequently asked questions

Which city is cheaper, Cochabamba or Pokhara?

Pokhara is cheaper: about $765/month against $890/month in Cochabamba, roughly 14% less for a typical remote worker's budget.

Which city is safer, Cochabamba or Pokhara?

Pokhara scores higher on safety: 7/10 against 6/10 for Cochabamba.

Which has faster internet, Cochabamba or Pokhara?

Cochabamba has faster typical internet: 70 Mbps against 60 Mbps in Pokhara.

LineCochabambaPokhara
Monthly total (USD)$890$765
Rent$330$280
Food$260$220
Transport$30$25
Coworking$65$60
Safety (out of 10)6/107/10
Internet (Mbps)7060
Climatetemperatetemperate
City sizemetromid
Settingmountainmountain
Nomad score (out of 10)6/107/10

Compare Cochabamba with

Compare Pokhara with

Costs are typical monthly figures for one person in USD, from the sources named on each city page; safety and internet are the catalogue's own ratings. Cost figures verified (Eastern Time): Cochabamba September 11, 2026, Pokhara September 11, 2026.