Chiang Mai vs Ulaanbaatar: cost of living for digital nomads
Chiang Mai, Thailand and Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, line by line from the catalogue: what a month costs, rent, food, coworking, safety and internet. Every figure links back to its source on the city page.
The short version
- Ulaanbaatar is about 5% cheaper than Chiang Mai for a month of nomad living ($1,050 vs $1,100).
- Chiang Mai scores higher on safety (8/10 vs 6/10).
- Internet is faster in Chiang Mai: 210 Mbps typical against 110 Mbps.
- Chiang Mai is tropical; Ulaanbaatar is continental.
Chiang Mai wins 3 of the measured lines; Ulaanbaatar wins 4.
Frequently asked questions
Which city is cheaper, Chiang Mai or Ulaanbaatar?
Ulaanbaatar is cheaper: about $1,050/month against $1,100/month in Chiang Mai, roughly 5% less for a typical remote worker's budget.
Which city is safer, Chiang Mai or Ulaanbaatar?
Chiang Mai scores higher on safety: 8/10 against 6/10 for Ulaanbaatar.
Which has faster internet, Chiang Mai or Ulaanbaatar?
Chiang Mai has faster typical internet: 210 Mbps against 110 Mbps in Ulaanbaatar.
| Line | Chiang Mai | Ulaanbaatar |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly total (USD) | $1,100 | $1,050 |
| Rent | $400 | $400 |
| Food | $320 | $300 |
| Transport | $40 | $30 |
| Coworking | $100 | $80 |
| Safety (out of 10) | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Internet (Mbps) | 210 | 110 |
| Climate | tropical | continental |
| City size | mid | metro |
| Setting | inland | inland |
| Nomad score (out of 10) | 10/10 | 5/10 |
Costs are typical monthly figures for one person in USD, from the sources named on each city page; safety and internet are the catalogue's own ratings. Cost figures verified (Eastern Time): Chiang Mai November 6, 2026, Ulaanbaatar September 11, 2026.